Flows On Demand — Workflow Automation Reviews
Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

n8n vs Make.com (2026): Developer Automation vs Visual Builder

n8n vs Make.com for 2026: which is better for complex workflows? Full comparison of features, pricing, and self-hosting capabilities.

n8n

n8n

Open-source power for developers

4.7/5
Full Review →
⭐ Winner
Make.com

Make.com

The visual automation powerhouse

4.8/5
Full Review →
Our Verdict

Make wins for most teams — easier to use, still very powerful. n8n wins when you need to write custom code, self-host, or process truly unlimited data.

Ease of Use

n8n

Developer-friendly node canvas. Requires comfort with APIs and JSON. Steep for non-technical users.

Make.com

Visual drag-and-drop scenario builder — more complex than Zapier but powerful once mastered.

Pricing

n8n

Self-hosted is completely free and unlimited. Cloud starts at $20/mo.

Make.com

Free tier available. Paid plans start at $9/mo. Operations-based pricing scales well.

Integrations

n8n

400+ native integrations. Any API reachable via HTTP node or custom code.

Make.com

4,000+ native integrations. HTTP module connects to any API.

Customization

n8n

Full JavaScript/Python inside workflow nodes. Unmatched customization.

Make.com

Advanced routing, data transformation, error handling, and iterators. No-code power.

Pricing Breakdown

n8n Pricing

Self-hostedUnlimited
Free
Starter2,500 executions/mo
$20/mo
Pro10,000 executions/mo
$50/mo
EnterpriseUnlimited
Custom

Make.com Pricing

Free1,000 ops/mo
$0/mo
Core10,000 ops/mo
$9/mo
Pro10,000 ops/mo + AI tools
$16/mo
Teams10,000 ops/mo + collaboration
$29/mo
Bottom Line

Winner: Make.com

Make wins for most teams — easier to use, still very powerful. n8n wins when you need to write custom code, self-host, or process truly unlimited data.

Related Comparisons