Flows On Demand — Workflow Automation Reviews
Head-to-Head Comparison · 2026

Make.com vs n8n (2026): Cloud Automation vs Open-Source Power

Make.com vs n8n compared: when to choose the visual cloud builder vs the self-hosted developer platform in 2026.

⭐ Winner
Make.com

Make.com

The visual automation powerhouse

4.8/5
Full Review →
n8n

n8n

Open-source power for developers

4.7/5
Full Review →
Our Verdict

n8n wins for developers who need full data control and unlimited self-hosted executions. Make wins for teams who want power without managing infrastructure.

Ease of Use

Make.com

Visual drag-and-drop scenario builder — more complex than Zapier but powerful once mastered.

n8n

Developer-friendly node canvas. Requires comfort with APIs and JSON. Steep for non-technical users.

Pricing

Make.com

Free tier available. Paid plans start at $9/mo. Operations-based pricing scales well.

n8n

Self-hosted is completely free and unlimited. Cloud starts at $20/mo.

Integrations

Make.com

4,000+ native integrations. HTTP module connects to any API.

n8n

400+ native integrations. Any API reachable via HTTP node or custom code.

Customization

Make.com

Advanced routing, data transformation, error handling, and iterators. No-code power.

n8n

Full JavaScript/Python inside workflow nodes. Unmatched customization.

Pricing Breakdown

Make.com Pricing

Free1,000 ops/mo
$0/mo
Core10,000 ops/mo
$9/mo
Pro10,000 ops/mo + AI tools
$16/mo
Teams10,000 ops/mo + collaboration
$29/mo

n8n Pricing

Self-hostedUnlimited
Free
Starter2,500 executions/mo
$20/mo
Pro10,000 executions/mo
$50/mo
EnterpriseUnlimited
Custom
Bottom Line

Winner: Make.com

n8n wins for developers who need full data control and unlimited self-hosted executions. Make wins for teams who want power without managing infrastructure.

Related Comparisons